
Personal communications styles
We all have our own style of communication. Sometimes it is effective but at other times it can be very ineffective if not hurtful and counterproductive. This is not always (and is probably rarely) deliberate. Sometimes we say things without meaning them, or being aware of how another person might hear them. Following are a few styles, most of which are not desirable because they can be hurtful.
Sometimes we deliberately fall in the following 'traps' because we lack knowledge, understanding or good judgement on some issues.
Avoiding the real issue
Changing the topic
Ignoring feelings
Invalidating emotion
Discounting -
“That’s nothing”
Contradicting -
“You don’t feel like that”
Reassuring -
“Don’t worry about it”
Providing solutions
Ordering -
“You have to…”
Threatening - “You’d better … or else”
Moralising - “You should …”
Suggesting -
“Why don’t you...”
Closed questions -
“Did you … “
It is probably better to ask a
question like: “Have you thought of… ?“
This enables the person to think for him/herself about the issue.
While we try to paraphrase to
tease out a person’s story, we do need to respond to help the person
become more at peace. Communicators have categorised the kinds of
responses we can make – some of them are desirable and some undesirable.
Here are a few:
Generalising – response is so general it can take the focus off a
person’s feelings.
Moralising – rejects the person’s feelings and suggests how they
ought to feel.
Dogmatic
– often a religious response implying how a person
should feel.
Probing –
questions that explore feelings or attitudes.
(However, avoid inquisitorial responses as these can
become offensive.)
Empathic


